Disclosure not Denial: Toward Truth and Transparency on UAPs
For many years, the discussion around unexplained flying objects (UFO) or
UAPs (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena), as they are now called, consisted of complete
rejection by downplaying their reported existence, explaining sightings by
reference to weather glitches, alleged military operations, or
overly excited imaginations. However, disclosures from
newly declassified military documents and testimony from trustworthy military personnel who are often firsthand
eyewitnesses, are demanding that the presence of these UAPs be treated
more seriously and investigated more thoroughly.
The whole landscape of this field changed in 2017 when the New York
Times published an article that detailed the
existence, purpose and findings of a hitherto unknown organisation named the Advanced
Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). Funded and executed by the
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the main goal of the
covert program was to evaluate the various claims of UAP's through data
collection, the examination of eyewitness testimonies, and a detailed analysis
of video, radar, sonar and other forms of telemetry, so as to ascertain whether
these phenomena posed any kind of threat to national security.
Despite decades of official denials of UFO activity, the findings of the
programme were unprecedented. AATIP recorded multiple UAP
incidents primarily involving pilots and members of the US military, where
aerial phenomena were able to demonstrate flying behaviours that often defied physics such as reaching previously
unattainable speeds, abrupt acceleration and deceleration, in addition to the
capacity to travel at such speeds in craft with no discernible system of
propulsion, such as the now famous Tic Tac video. AATIP were unable to offer any credible theories for the phenomena,
finding anomalous weather events and the possibility of cutting-edge foreign
technologies insufficient to explain the encounters. Although AATIP did not reach
any firm conclusion on the intent or origin of the UAP’s, they did state the
superior technological capabilities of the aircraft meant that they should be regarded
as a potential threat given how they enter and
leave restricted military airspace at will.
So how is this relevant to my blog?
It does appear that the release of declassified information may indicate
a willingness to break from the longstanding practice of secrecy and
withholding evidence in favour of a more open and transparent relationship with
the public. This blog hopes to report on the latest information releases,
inquiries, research and discoveries as they arise while relying entirely on
credible, mainstream news services and government departments, in a way that
that will encourage a more informed discussion of the phenomenon of UAP.
References
Crawford, J. (2017, December 19). Pentagon study of UFOs revealed |
CNN politics. CNN.
https://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/16/politics/pentagon-ufo-project/index.html
Gabbatt, A., & Chao-Fong, L. (2023, July 26). UFO hearing key
takeaways: cover-up claims and Pentagon denials. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/26/ufo-hearing-update-congress-whistleblower
Guardian News. (2020, April 28). Pentagon officially releases “UFO”
videos [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auITEKd4sjA
Comments
Post a Comment